This week I found it really helpful when we discussed our
reactions to the 2x2 by Jackson and the 2x2 Jason created. After class, I have
been thinking a lot about how social media can serve as a global public forum
on many different levels. In regards to social media, how would a company that
only interacts domestically fit in to the 2x2 when it uses social media to
interact domestically? Does that mean that the company creates a global public
sphere if it only physically interacts on the domestic level put attempts to
create a global public sphere through the use of technology? What about news
sources that also use social media in an attempt to facilitate a global public
sphere but filter their news to only appeal to a specific domestic level? Does an
opportunity for a global public sphere, even if there is only domestic
interaction in that sphere, still count as a global public sphere? With other
types of global public spheres, do these questions have similar answers? What
about the issues that Mike discussed in his post this week? How would they
relate?
These questions are operating under the assumption that
social media and technology can create a global public sphere by transcending
territorial boundaries and giving the opportunity for people from all over the
world to discuss issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment