In his lecture on ideas and interests,
Dr. Jackson asked if it was possible to determine what publicly available ideas
and norms an actor is drawing on, and if possible, what happens if it looks
like an actor is drawing on incompatible logic.
The process of trying to separate
and characterize the ideas and interests of an actor is, in my opinion,
somewhat convoluted. Ideas lead to
interests and interests can lead to ideas. My understanding is that individual actors are quite a bit
more opaque than states when it comes to deciphering ideas and interests. Individuals don’t necessarily express
their ideas and there’s not always an opportunity to do so. Depending on the particular norm or
idea, an actor’s position may change over time or depending on context. Incompatible logic of individual actors
is rarely a matter of major concern, and I imagine a lot of individuals change
their opinions throughout their lifetime with little to no effect.
States, on the other hand, are by
necessity more transparent. States
are often in situations in which they are required to take a clear position on
a matter, such as in the passage of legislation or a public statement, and these statements may reflect internalized ideas and norms. If they appeared to be drawing on
incompatible logic, even that based on the ideas and norms of the majority, the
result would most likely be much different than if an individual was drawing on
incompatible logic. States,
and the elected officials that represent them, are constantly under scrutiny
and their ideas are expected to remain more stable over time. Their positions are often put in
writing for record or publication, and are expected to demonstrate a consistent
ideology in order to be considered competent.
How do we figure out what ideas are
actually important? Objectively, they all are. Regardless of compatibility, the ideas of individuals and
States tell us a little bit about their culture and what they consider
important. If ideas are incompatible, this in itself may share a little more information regarding how their culture might be changing over time.
No comments:
Post a Comment