I’m a soccer fan. Always have been,
always will be. So, when
Goldman Sachs predicted
the winner of the 2014 FIFA World Cup on Wednesday, I immediately started
thinking of ways I could tie soccer to international relations.
During class on Tuesday, we were
asked to think about a case where interests allowed ideas to emerge or
grow. Although this isn’t a one-time
incident, I consider the FIFA World Cup to be a strong example of interests
allowing ideas to grow. In its mission,
FIFA states that its goal is “to improve the game of football constantly and
promote it globally in the light of its unifying, educational, cultural, and
humanitarian values…” FIFA legitimizes
their interest in promoting football through the spreading of positive ideas –
cooperation, education, cultural and humanitarian values.
As an organization, FIFA has
inspired countless young soccer players across the globe, and aims to unite
countries in shared competition. For example, in 1967, a two-day truce was called
during the Nigerian Civil War so that both sides could watch the famed Pelé
play. FIFA has set a positive
example of international cooperation by uniting soccer players in pursuit of a
common endeavor despite different worldviews. By participating, the teams spread national pride and
international awareness for their country, connect with other international
athletes, and have a chance at international fame.
There is, unfortunately, a caveat
involved in FIFA’s financial support of international tournaments. Recently, there have been numerous
demonstrations throughout Brazil under the banner “FIFA GO HOME.” These demonstrators are attempting to
bring to light the corruption and enormous cost of hosting the World Cup. FIFA has approved the largest budget in
its history for the upcoming kick-off in less than two weeks, but Brazil has yet
to finish several stadiums, a light rail project, an airport terminal, and
road projects, the latter three of which were intended to benefit Brazil long
term. Federal prosecutors are currently
investigating the role of corruption behind a number of the unfinished
infrastructure expansions.
FIFA's interests can allow ideas to grow and ideals to
flourish by setting an example through international cooperation and the
sharing of different cultural values. Additionally, many of the infrastructure improvements they
sponsor are intended benefit the host country following the tournament, and
when done correctly, can benefit the country for years to come. However, financial and political
interests are making it impossible for FIFA to achieve its goals to promote its
own ideals. In fact, the wealthy and powerful seem poised to convert the World
Cup — in both fact and public perception — into an event that only further
consolidates economic and political power.
Joy, this is a great way to think about international relations! I am also a soccer fan and I can definitely see where you are coming from. I have been trying to think of a way to incorporate athletics, health awareness, education and cultural sensitivity into one program, but apparently FIFA is already there. However, I can see where the ideas versus interests debate comes in. FIFA my have humanitarian, cultural and educational values and ideas but they are clearly also interested in money and fame. Which is the driving factor in the organization? Who's to say it's not both? As with many many other actors in the world, it seems that both interests and ideas play a role here.
ReplyDeleteTaylor, thanks for commenting! I certainly understand your point and agree that FIFA’s actions are fueled by a combination of both ideas and interests. Money and fame are strong motivators, but in my opinion FIFA works hard to be seen more in a humanitarian light. They maintain transparency by publishing their income, expenses and financial reports each year, as well as post the budget of both their individual and ongoing projects around the world.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/finances/index.html
In a sense, is FIFA a mechanism to allocate development dollars? If you are interested, there is relevant economic work on FIFA and the IOC on how "hosting" a big event such as a World Cup or Olympics is actually not great for the economies of developing countries.
ReplyDelete